forum.virtualchallengemeets.com
Your connection to the competitive math/science community. (Formerly texasmath.org)
2010-2011 UIL Number sense tests
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
2010-2011 UIL Number sense tests
by jontull2003 » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:28 am
Does anyone have the 2010-2011 UIL Number Sense tests? They were on the website but now they are not.
- jontull2003
- Typical User
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:30 pm
Re: 2010-2011 UIL Number sense tests
by 88bobcat » Fri Jul 06, 2012 1:16 pm
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
-
88bobcat - Celebrated Spammer
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 10:51 pm
- Location: Orange, TX
Re: 2010-2011 UIL Number sense tests
by 88bobcat » Fri Jul 06, 2012 1:28 pm
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
-
88bobcat - Celebrated Spammer
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 10:51 pm
- Location: Orange, TX
Re: 2010-2011 UIL Number sense tests
by darksaber21 » Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:37 pm
They all are on the website, except for the 2011 Region test. I have no idea where that one is.
Now I know the stakes, and I'm willing to show what I gots. I will see you all at state for the first and final time, so let's end the year with a bang! :)
MTHS - Class 5A, District VII, Region I
MTHS - Class 5A, District VII, Region I
- darksaber21
- Celebrated Spammer
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 6:20 pm
- Location: Arlington, TX
Re: 2010-2011 UIL Number sense tests
by nsguy1350 » Fri Jul 06, 2012 4:24 pm
Hmm... any idea of when the 2011-2012 tests will be up?
2013 District 1/Region:
NS - 319/355
MA - 340/332
CA - 294/287
SC - 344/292
CS - 212/124 (fail)
NS - 319/355
MA - 340/332
CA - 294/287
SC - 344/292
CS - 212/124 (fail)
- nsguy1350
- Ubiquitous Spammer
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:16 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: 2010-2011 UIL Number sense tests
by darksaber21 » Fri Jul 06, 2012 6:02 pm
They are all up except for, I believe, the State and TMSCA State tests for 2012. When they will be up I have no idea. I'm wondering if they will ever be put up anytime soon.
Now I know the stakes, and I'm willing to show what I gots. I will see you all at state for the first and final time, so let's end the year with a bang! :)
MTHS - Class 5A, District VII, Region I
MTHS - Class 5A, District VII, Region I
- darksaber21
- Celebrated Spammer
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 6:20 pm
- Location: Arlington, TX
Re: 2010-2011 UIL Number sense tests
by nsguy1350 » Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:05 am
Oh, sorry I meant the State test, not all of the tests.
Oh, and the TMSCA State results never got up either.
Oh, and the TMSCA State results never got up either.
2013 District 1/Region:
NS - 319/355
MA - 340/332
CA - 294/287
SC - 344/292
CS - 212/124 (fail)
NS - 319/355
MA - 340/332
CA - 294/287
SC - 344/292
CS - 212/124 (fail)
- nsguy1350
- Ubiquitous Spammer
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:16 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: 2010-2011 UIL Number sense tests
by 88bobcat » Sat Jul 07, 2012 12:18 pm
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
-
88bobcat - Celebrated Spammer
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 10:51 pm
- Location: Orange, TX
Re: 2010-2011 UIL Number sense tests
by nsguy1350 » Sat Jul 07, 2012 3:16 pm
I meant the UIL State test, sorry for the ambiguity. I want a blank sheet to re-test myself. Not the TMSCA State test. Man I need to clear up my questions more.
The TMSCA State results/State test statements weren't associated, but I see that putting those two statements close together like that can be misleading.
The TMSCA State results/State test statements weren't associated, but I see that putting those two statements close together like that can be misleading.
2013 District 1/Region:
NS - 319/355
MA - 340/332
CA - 294/287
SC - 344/292
CS - 212/124 (fail)
NS - 319/355
MA - 340/332
CA - 294/287
SC - 344/292
CS - 212/124 (fail)
- nsguy1350
- Ubiquitous Spammer
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:16 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: 2010-2011 UIL Number sense tests
by smeag » Tue Jul 31, 2012 7:57 am
Hi, I had a question on adding terms: 1 + 4 + 7 + 10 + ... + 25
how do you find the number of terms? I always thought you did: (25 - 1)/3
Can someone please explain, I get 8 but the number of terms is 9...
how do you find the number of terms? I always thought you did: (25 - 1)/3
Can someone please explain, I get 8 but the number of terms is 9...
Eels always look like they just told a joke, and are waiting for a response.
-
smeag - Incessant Spammer
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:17 am
Re: 2010-2011 UIL Number sense tests
by darksaber21 » Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:39 pm
You did it right, but when you do that, you add one to the overall number.
Let's use an example:
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
To find the number of terms, just do this:
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
Where [unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula] is the last term, [unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula] is the first term, and [unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula] is the absolute difference between the numbers.
So in this case, since the first term is one and the last term is 41, and the difference is 4:
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
So 11 terms.
Reason why this works is due to the fact that you are basically taking out the first term with the [unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula] part, so the +1 is supposed to counter that.
So using your example:
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
Let's use an example:
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
To find the number of terms, just do this:
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
Where [unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula] is the last term, [unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula] is the first term, and [unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula] is the absolute difference between the numbers.
So in this case, since the first term is one and the last term is 41, and the difference is 4:
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
So 11 terms.
Reason why this works is due to the fact that you are basically taking out the first term with the [unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula] part, so the +1 is supposed to counter that.
So using your example:
[unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula]
Now I know the stakes, and I'm willing to show what I gots. I will see you all at state for the first and final time, so let's end the year with a bang! :)
MTHS - Class 5A, District VII, Region I
MTHS - Class 5A, District VII, Region I
- darksaber21
- Celebrated Spammer
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2012 6:20 pm
- Location: Arlington, TX
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests